Good words from one who is part of the organization I've worked with.
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Good Leadership is about Right Relationship
"If you put people first, you will get your task complete. If you push
people aside for the sake of your task, you strain relationships and you
decrease the anointing and blessing of God on your task. How you do
things matters as much as what you get done."
Lisa Orvis
Lisa Orvis
Monday, April 21, 2014
He Hates
God HATES sin. He HATES it. And sometimes we take it personal as we try out best to not go the pathway of sin. And yet when I see someone I know and live destroyed by sin. As I look at the news and see how greed and corruption and self-interest is destroying whole nations, I know why God hates it. I hate it too!! Every sin destroys something beautiful he has made.
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Gutted at the cross
I was thinking earlier today that something that must have been beyond painful was for Jesus to look down and see the utter grief and despair of his mother. The road of obedience and his purpose in life caused excruciating pain to the one on earth he most loved. And he couldn't even put his arm around her to comfort her. Thus John. One of the most touching and moving moments of a terrible crucifixion.
Monday, April 14, 2014
The invitation?
I think sometimes we would do better to invite people to Jesus as the Scriptures say rather than to our churches first. Church is the fruit of gathering together those who are following after Jesus.
Sunday, April 13, 2014
What are we teaching?
After Jesus told them to go and make disciples, baptizing them in the
name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, he then told them to teach
Bible stories. Actually, this is the truth. We are told repeatedly to
tell the stories of God's faithfulness from one generation to the next
(Ps 71:18). But this Scripture takes it a step beyond and gives the
focus of our teaching: we teach others to obey.
We don't just teach so that there is increased knowledge. We don't teach for teaching's sake. We teach for obedience. But how do we do this and not become some control freak church or ministry? Or a church or school that teaches knowledge but not obedience?
The only true way to approach this is to ask, "How did Jesus teach obedience?"
We don't just teach so that there is increased knowledge. We don't teach for teaching's sake. We teach for obedience. But how do we do this and not become some control freak church or ministry? Or a church or school that teaches knowledge but not obedience?
The only true way to approach this is to ask, "How did Jesus teach obedience?"
Saturday, April 12, 2014
The Great Commission and a Great Big Mirror
We've heard it so many times we probably have rarely stopped to ponder it:
"Go into all the world and preach the gospel, making disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit." Mat 28:18-20
This has been something I've been pondering a lot lately as I'm relooking at how we do things(future posts probably to come).
When we think of the word "Go" we tend to think of missionaries in Africa or in the jungles of Papua New Guinea. This is a valid form of "Go" but may I also add that I think the best place to go is the living room?
Traditional church structure is based very much on an attractional model. Being a beautiful building in the city (tends to be more in the Catholic realm) or if you have a functional building, make your service attractive--good music, good dramas, good preaching, video clips, etc... (Protestant realm). Then be really nice to visitors and have a shake-hands time in your church to meet them in hopes they'll come back. There's been a real trend lately to establish "churches for those who don't like church" but their methods are generally the same, just different attraction points for different people. And honestly, if it brings people into the kingdom, I'm good with that. Although I'm pondering if there is a better way for a different season of our country. The attractional model isn't working well. Church is good for churched people but unchurched people aren't coming.
The heart of the Great Commission is to go. It doesn't say to invite people to come (although this has borne some fruit). When I travel and have gone into new churches, it's like entering a foreign country where I've invaded a person's social club. I don't know the rules nor the people and I don't know when to sit and when to stand (especially at communion). It is at times just awkward. If I as a Christitan am uncomfortable, are we asking seekers and unbelievers to do the same? Come into our strange world vs. entering into theirs? This isn't just about having "church" at the local bar. It's deeper than that. It's "going" to where they are at, meeting others on their turf, in their culture with their questions.
When we look at Jesus this is exactly what he was doing. He was in the Pharisees's house, at the tax-collector's party, in the home of Lazarus, etc... Over and over he met people where they were at, even inviting himself into their homes (Zacchaeus). It wasn't about them coming to the synagogue service, it was about him going to their living room.
The word "disciple" is another one, probably even moreso that I've been percolating on. Interesting that Jesus nowhere says to make "converts" or to "plant churches." With converts and church plants we have something we measure and can pat ourself on the back as we carve another notch in our evangelism belt. But with discipleship and "making disicples"? It never ends. There is always room to grow. And the truth is that there are a lot of people in church who are attenders. Wouldn't you love to see a lot more disciples? Perhaps the reason is our methods. We make converts, plant churchs, feel good about ourselves and move on. But have we made disciples?
Baptism. It was the way people responded to the gospel and in Scripture it was almost always public. It wasn't about raising your hand, asking Jesus into your heart, filling out a card, or saying the sinner's prayer. (All of which are very good.) But the entry point of a person coming to Christ was baptism. John 4 opening verses say that an accusation was brought against Jesus that he was "making and baptizing" more disciples than John, although it was his disciples doing the baptizing. But clearly in so many scriptures baptism is where people said "I do." Perhaps we should use Acts 2:38 in our gospel presentation in addition to Romans 10:9.
So where is this going? These are observations that are based on wanting to see a change that changes a nation. Our country needs Jesus desperately and we must pray for it daily, but like the sons of Issachar we need to be wise to the times. I believe to do this it begins with us "going" as the Scripture says and not expecting that they "come," that we make disciples and not just converts, and that people understand obedience and being filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38) that they can be empowered to live His life and do so with His power. But to do so we need to be intentional. And it isn't just about creating another method to fill the church buildings.
"Go into all the world and preach the gospel, making disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit." Mat 28:18-20
This has been something I've been pondering a lot lately as I'm relooking at how we do things(future posts probably to come).
When we think of the word "Go" we tend to think of missionaries in Africa or in the jungles of Papua New Guinea. This is a valid form of "Go" but may I also add that I think the best place to go is the living room?
Traditional church structure is based very much on an attractional model. Being a beautiful building in the city (tends to be more in the Catholic realm) or if you have a functional building, make your service attractive--good music, good dramas, good preaching, video clips, etc... (Protestant realm). Then be really nice to visitors and have a shake-hands time in your church to meet them in hopes they'll come back. There's been a real trend lately to establish "churches for those who don't like church" but their methods are generally the same, just different attraction points for different people. And honestly, if it brings people into the kingdom, I'm good with that. Although I'm pondering if there is a better way for a different season of our country. The attractional model isn't working well. Church is good for churched people but unchurched people aren't coming.
The heart of the Great Commission is to go. It doesn't say to invite people to come (although this has borne some fruit). When I travel and have gone into new churches, it's like entering a foreign country where I've invaded a person's social club. I don't know the rules nor the people and I don't know when to sit and when to stand (especially at communion). It is at times just awkward. If I as a Christitan am uncomfortable, are we asking seekers and unbelievers to do the same? Come into our strange world vs. entering into theirs? This isn't just about having "church" at the local bar. It's deeper than that. It's "going" to where they are at, meeting others on their turf, in their culture with their questions.
When we look at Jesus this is exactly what he was doing. He was in the Pharisees's house, at the tax-collector's party, in the home of Lazarus, etc... Over and over he met people where they were at, even inviting himself into their homes (Zacchaeus). It wasn't about them coming to the synagogue service, it was about him going to their living room.
The word "disciple" is another one, probably even moreso that I've been percolating on. Interesting that Jesus nowhere says to make "converts" or to "plant churches." With converts and church plants we have something we measure and can pat ourself on the back as we carve another notch in our evangelism belt. But with discipleship and "making disicples"? It never ends. There is always room to grow. And the truth is that there are a lot of people in church who are attenders. Wouldn't you love to see a lot more disciples? Perhaps the reason is our methods. We make converts, plant churchs, feel good about ourselves and move on. But have we made disciples?
Baptism. It was the way people responded to the gospel and in Scripture it was almost always public. It wasn't about raising your hand, asking Jesus into your heart, filling out a card, or saying the sinner's prayer. (All of which are very good.) But the entry point of a person coming to Christ was baptism. John 4 opening verses say that an accusation was brought against Jesus that he was "making and baptizing" more disciples than John, although it was his disciples doing the baptizing. But clearly in so many scriptures baptism is where people said "I do." Perhaps we should use Acts 2:38 in our gospel presentation in addition to Romans 10:9.
So where is this going? These are observations that are based on wanting to see a change that changes a nation. Our country needs Jesus desperately and we must pray for it daily, but like the sons of Issachar we need to be wise to the times. I believe to do this it begins with us "going" as the Scripture says and not expecting that they "come," that we make disciples and not just converts, and that people understand obedience and being filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38) that they can be empowered to live His life and do so with His power. But to do so we need to be intentional. And it isn't just about creating another method to fill the church buildings.
Friday, April 11, 2014
Cost and College
About a year or two ago the college I attended was slammed for not being "cost-effective." A blogger asked that people negate this by posting "Worth it!" if they disagreed. I was about to add my voice too when I stopped. I tried again but I just couldn't do it.
I had a great college experience, wonderful instructors, classmates who are doing great things and still loving their families. In fact none of my immediate friends in college have ever been divorced. I LOVED my college experience and it was the best thing I could've done at that point in my life. And yet, I couldn't say, "worth it" on that blog.
The reason those two words couldn't come off my keyboard is more cultural than it is specific to the college I attended. When I hear of a friend who is trying to serve the poor in the worst places of the world but has the albatross of $40k in student loans around his neck, I cringe. When I hear of another friend who has trouble buying a house because their loan is $50k it bothers me. I think about an older guy I know who is slammed with $90k in school loans but at least has a job now that can put a roof over his head, although he doesn't make much money nor can he pay on his loans.
What is it in our culture (and even church culture) that says we need to spend $60-100k to be validated? To be employable? To be legit? What is a system that requires us to be laden down with debt? Yes, God can provide and he did for me. But is there really such a thing as "good" "debt?" It almost sounds oxymoronic when mirrored to the Scripture that to be a debtor is to be a slave.
I would like to challenge the format that says when we're in college we need to take a lot of courses that are not specific to our area of interest so that we become "well-rounded." Does excessive debt make us well-rounded?
I would like to challenge a system especially in ministry that says that one must have a degree before they become a valid pastor or church worker. Perhaps Paul's credentials of being imprisoned, 40 lashes minus one, and persisting in hunger and cold and beatings for the sake of the gospel could also be credentials?
I would like to challenge a structure that says taking tests on a piece of paper determines if we're qualified or not. What about whether they can do the job? What about those who can do the job but they can't pass the written test?
I'm for training. It's what gets me excited. It keeps me up at night. And I still love a good college course. But it's when I see people I love struggling under the burden of debt for 20 or more years that I want to see a change. When I see people graduate who have a lot of ideas, opinions and have passed the test but not the test of life that I wonder if there's a different way. I just wonder. Perhaps a bit of me longs for more apprenticeship like structure. More hands-on, smaller numbers with greater I Do/You Do mentorship. Or even a hybrid form of classroom with greater emphasis on experience. Less test-taking and more life-making. Some are moving this way but still at greater and greater costs to the students. I truly hope change is in the air in how we train people. I think this generation is hungry for a different way and I would hate to see that hunger dulled.
I had a great college experience, wonderful instructors, classmates who are doing great things and still loving their families. In fact none of my immediate friends in college have ever been divorced. I LOVED my college experience and it was the best thing I could've done at that point in my life. And yet, I couldn't say, "worth it" on that blog.
The reason those two words couldn't come off my keyboard is more cultural than it is specific to the college I attended. When I hear of a friend who is trying to serve the poor in the worst places of the world but has the albatross of $40k in student loans around his neck, I cringe. When I hear of another friend who has trouble buying a house because their loan is $50k it bothers me. I think about an older guy I know who is slammed with $90k in school loans but at least has a job now that can put a roof over his head, although he doesn't make much money nor can he pay on his loans.
What is it in our culture (and even church culture) that says we need to spend $60-100k to be validated? To be employable? To be legit? What is a system that requires us to be laden down with debt? Yes, God can provide and he did for me. But is there really such a thing as "good" "debt?" It almost sounds oxymoronic when mirrored to the Scripture that to be a debtor is to be a slave.
I would like to challenge the format that says when we're in college we need to take a lot of courses that are not specific to our area of interest so that we become "well-rounded." Does excessive debt make us well-rounded?
I would like to challenge a system especially in ministry that says that one must have a degree before they become a valid pastor or church worker. Perhaps Paul's credentials of being imprisoned, 40 lashes minus one, and persisting in hunger and cold and beatings for the sake of the gospel could also be credentials?
I would like to challenge a structure that says taking tests on a piece of paper determines if we're qualified or not. What about whether they can do the job? What about those who can do the job but they can't pass the written test?
I'm for training. It's what gets me excited. It keeps me up at night. And I still love a good college course. But it's when I see people I love struggling under the burden of debt for 20 or more years that I want to see a change. When I see people graduate who have a lot of ideas, opinions and have passed the test but not the test of life that I wonder if there's a different way. I just wonder. Perhaps a bit of me longs for more apprenticeship like structure. More hands-on, smaller numbers with greater I Do/You Do mentorship. Or even a hybrid form of classroom with greater emphasis on experience. Less test-taking and more life-making. Some are moving this way but still at greater and greater costs to the students. I truly hope change is in the air in how we train people. I think this generation is hungry for a different way and I would hate to see that hunger dulled.
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Rethinking
Jesus taught the crowds, but he trained the disciples.
To go high you must go deep,
To go fast, you must go slow,
Go large, you must go small.
To go high you must go deep,
To go fast, you must go slow,
Go large, you must go small.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)